Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 21:15

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Should a male with long hair comb his hair daily?
What’s next?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Otsuka tops Vera Therapeutics in kidney disease study showdown - statnews.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why is my ex still keeping in touch with me even though she dumped me?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Underwater Megavolcano Set to Release Millions of Tons of Lava, Experts Warn - The Daily Galaxy
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Norris fastest as Piastri hits the wall during FP3 in Canada - Formula 1